[ad_1]
Join top executives in San Francisco on July 11-12, to learn how leaders are integrating and optimizing AI investments for success. Kyunghyun Cho, a prominent AI researcher and an associate professor at New York University, believes the current discourse around AI risk is distracting from the real issues, both positive and negative, posed by today’s AI. In a recent interview with VentureBeat, Cho expressed disappointment about the lack of concrete proposals at the recent Senate hearings related to regulating AI’s current harms, as well as a lack of discussion on how to boost beneficial uses of AI. Cho also warned against glorifying “hero scientists” and taking any one person’s warnings as gospel.
## The Distracting Doomer Narratives
Cho expressed disappointment with the recent discourse around AI risk, especially the “doomer” narratives suggesting potential existential threats from the future development of artificial general intelligence (AGI). He believes these narratives are distracting from the real issues currently posed by AI.
## Lack of Concrete Proposals
Cho also expressed disappointment in the lack of concrete proposals at recent Senate hearings related to regulating AI’s current harms and a lack of discussion on how to boost beneficial use of AI.
## Hero Scientists Narrative
Cho warned against glorifying “hero scientists” and taking any one person’s warnings as gospel. He believes that the collective endeavor of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, across decades creates AGI research.
## Counter-Narrative
The counter-narrative emphasizes critical thinking of both positive and negative outcomes of AI, including immediate harms and benefits, and their regulation.
## Conclusion
The fascination and excitement of the scientific advances in AGI are fascinating; however, scientists and policymakers must remain critical about the positive and negative impacts such advances may have on society.
## FAQ
**What is the counter-narrative to the doomer narratives?**
The counter-narrative emphasizes critical thinking of both positive and negative outcomes of AI, including immediate harms and benefits, and their regulation.
**What did Cho express disappointment in?**
Cho expressed disappointment in the lack of concrete proposals at recent Senate hearings related to regulating AI’s current harms and a lack of discussion on how to boost beneficial use of AI.
**What is Cho’s view on the hero scientist narrative?**
Cho views the hero scientist narrative as potentially harmful and negative. He believes that the collective endeavor of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, across decades creates AGI research.
**What does Cho believe are the key issues with AI today?**
Cho believes that both positive and negative issues posed by today’s AI, including its immediate harms and benefits, are essential issues to consider.
[ad_2]
For more information, please refer this link